Trial reportTechnology in cancer research & treatment
The Effect of Early Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Early Mobilization on Preventing the Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness in Lung Cancer Resection Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionThe aim of this research is to examine the impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and early mobilization (EM) on preventing the intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) in lung cancer resection patients.MethodsThis was a single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized into NMES, EM, and control groups. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of ICU-AW, with secondary outcomes encompassing differences in handgrip strength, duration of stay in the ICU, and overall hospital length of stay across the groups.ResultsBoth interventions demonstrated significant reductions in ICU-AW incidence compared with the control group. The EM group had odds ratios of 0.10 (95% CI 0.03 - 0.31) at 2 days post-admission and 0.07 (95% CI 0.02 - 0.26) at ICU discharge, while the NMES group showed comparable reductions (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02 - 0.23 and OR 0.02; 95% CI 0.00 - 0.18, respectively). No significant between-intervention differences were observed. Compared with the control group, both intervention groups showed significantly greater handgrip strength at two days after ICU admission and at ICU discharge (P < 0.05). Neither intervention significantly affected ICU or hospital length of stay (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.