SynthesisPloS one2026
D-dimer and lower limb ultrasound as prognostic factors for recurrent deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harnessing flavonoids as innovative agents for the modulation of platelet activation and thrombotic disorders.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolic disease is a chronic, recurrent condition. The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy remains uncertain. We aim to evaluate D-dimer and lower limb ultrasonography as prognostic tools for the recurrence of venous thromboembolism. A search was conducted on May 28, 2022, in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Inclusion criteria encompassed cohort studies, case-control studies, and clinical trials. Two reviewers independently screened all records and analyzed studies for inclusion/exclusion criteria, as well as risk of bias, using a structured framework (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022341082). The initial search yielded 4652 titles and abstracts. After removing 777 duplicates and reviewing 3875 titles and abstracts, 48 articles providing information on D-dimer and/or lower limb ultrasonography as prognostic factors were finally included. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that both residual vein thrombosis (RVT) at anticoagulation discontinuation and a positive post-treatment D-dimer are significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). For RVT, the pooled analysis showed a two-fold increase in risk (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.94; I² = 85.7) while for positive D-dimer, the risk was similarly elevated (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.85-3.33; I² = 56.0). In conclusion, very low-quality evidence suggests that abnormal D-dimer and RVT are associated with recurrent VTE; however, this association is inconsistent due to significant heterogeneity and wide prediction intervals. These biomarkers should be interpreted with caution as isolated predictors in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.