ArticlePloS one2026
A curated dataset and lightweight deep learning framework for tea leaf disease classification.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tea (Camellia sinensis) is the world's second most consumed beverage, enjoyed daily by more than two billion people. In Bangladesh, it serves as a cornerstone agricultural export and a major sector of the domestic economy. However, commercial tea cultivation remains highly vulnerable to fungal and pest-related diseases such as Blight, Red Rust, and Helopeltis which severely reduce crop yield and compromise leaf quality. While early detection is critical to preventing widespread outbreaks, traditional manual inspection is slow, subjective, and highly error-prone. Deep learning provides a scalable alternative, yet single-branch networks often struggle to capture both minute disease lesions and broader structural degradation simultaneously. To address this, we propose a Hybrid Feature Fusion architecture that runs two highly efficient feature extractors in parallel: EfficientNetV2-Small to isolate fine-grained local textures, and MobileNetV3-Small to capture the global structural context of the leaf. The models were trained and evaluated on a real-world dataset of 2,000 annotated images, evenly distributed across the four target classes (Blight, Red Rust, Helopeltis, and Healthy). Before training, the images underwent a standardized preprocessing pipeline including resizing to 224 × 224 pixels and normalization, supplemented by a dynamic augmentation strategy featuring random rotations, horizontal flips, and brightness adjustments to improve model robustness. The proposed hybrid framework achieved an outstanding peak classification accuracy of 96.80% alongside a macro Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.9980. To rigorously validate its performance, the hybrid model was benchmarked against six diverse architectures: a Vision Transformer (ViT-B16 at 76.40%), a Custom CNN (89.60%), MobileNetV3 (94.40%), ResNet50 (95.60%), DenseNet121 (96.40%), and EfficientNetV2-B3 (97.60%). Although EfficientNetV2-B3 achieved a marginally higher raw accuracy, the proposed dual-branch framework delivered a superior precision-recall balance and faster convergence stability. These findings demonstrate that the proposed hybrid methodology is highly reliable and computationally balanced, making it an ideal candidate for integration into Internet of Things (IoT) edge devices for real-time disease monitoring in precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.