ArticlePloS one2026
Gender, status, and team interaction: A microdynamic exploration of wearable sensor data across 11 research groups.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diversity research is increasingly moving beyond a static focus on linear relationships between team-level diversity attributes and outcomes toward a dynamic, configurational perspective on team processes. Recent developments emphasise the structural dimensions of interpersonal relations within teams and how dyadic relationships, mutual perceptions, and behaviours shape team-level outcomes over time. Drawing on real-world organisational data, we apply a hierarchical Dynamic Actor Network Model to examine the role of gender homophily, professional status, and gender-based status cues in face-to-face interactions across 11 R&D teams. Our analysis of wearable sensor data reveals nuanced patterns that challenge any clear-cut diversity effects within teams. Although mixed‑gender interactions are generally more common, the interplay between professional status and gender‑based status cues changes across organisational contexts. Professional status shows no clear effect on interaction frequency, whereas gender‑based status effects are observed in research laboratories but not in private companies. These findings underscore the continued relevance of demographic attributes and associated status dynamics, while highlighting the value of a configurational and temporally sensitive approach to understanding team interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.