Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42139318›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Gender, status, and team interaction: A microdynamic exploration of wearable sensor data across 11 research groups.

Jörg Müller, Alvaro Uzaheta, Julián Salas Piñón

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jörg MüllerInterdisciplinary Research Centre on Social and Cultural Transformations, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7727-2117
Alvaro UzahetaSocial Networks Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Julián Salas PiñónDepartment of Information and Communications Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversity research is increasingly moving beyond a static focus on linear relationships between team-level diversity attributes and outcomes toward a dynamic, configurational perspective on team processes. Recent developments emphasise the structural dimensions of interpersonal relations within teams and how dyadic relationships, mutual perceptions, and behaviours shape team-level outcomes over time. Drawing on real-world organisational data, we apply a hierarchical Dynamic Actor Network Model to examine the role of gender homophily, professional status, and gender-based status cues in face-to-face interactions across 11 R&D teams. Our analysis of wearable sensor data reveals nuanced patterns that challenge any clear-cut diversity effects within teams. Although mixed‑gender interactions are generally more common, the interplay between professional status and gender‑based status cues changes across organisational contexts. Professional status shows no clear effect on interaction frequency, whereas gender‑based status effects are observed in research laboratories but not in private companies. These findings underscore the continued relevance of demographic attributes and associated status dynamics, while highlighting the value of a configurational and temporally sensitive approach to understanding team interaction.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsWearable Electronic DevicesFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansMaleResearch PersonnelSex FactorsSocial GroupWorkforce Diversity

Identifiers

PMID42139318
PMCPMC13178976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.