ArticlePloS one2026
Frontline decision autonomy under decentralization: Evidence from health sector reform.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decentralization is designed to transfer autonomy from more central to more local actors, yet studies show differences in the autonomy realized under these reforms. Drawing on the case of health sector decentralization in Honduras, we utilize the decision space approach and original data for over 600 frontline health workers in a matched sample to explain facility-level autonomy. We find that reported decision autonomy in four functional areas is slightly reduced under decentralization, reductions are most pronounced where decentralization is led by municipal governments or associations, rather than NGOs, and differences across staff types are modest. Furthermore, capacity and resources are necessary for expanded autonomy, particularly in organizing service delivery, while supportive accountability allows for increased autonomy in human resources and finances. Our research shows the importance of including frontline staff in studies of decision autonomy under decentralization and considering the distribution of autonomy across levels in hierarchical service delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.