ArticlePloS one2026
Research on the allocation mechanism of grassland ecological compensation among different industries based on ecosystem product value accounting.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The manifestation and allocation of the positive externalities of grassland ecosystem products are critical to realizing the value of ecological compensation. Previous studies on ecological compensation have largely overlooked the heterogeneity of ecosystem products within regions and the differences in compensation among various industrial sectors, particularly the alignment and regulatory role between industrial structure and ecological compensation. In response, this study shifts the focus from interregional horizontal compensation to intraregional structural compensation, emphasizing the rational allocation mechanism of ecosystem product value among different industrial actors. Based on meteorological monitoring data and land-use data, the value of grassland ecosystem products is estimated using the water balance method and soil erosion equations. Furthermore, an inter-industry ecological compensation allocation model is constructed based on the consumption value of grassland ecosystem products and the proportion of industrial structure. The results show that: (1) From 2013 to 2023, none of the four major pastoral regions are required to bear ecological compensation for carbon sequestration and oxygen release consumed by the livestock industry; however, the average ecological compensation surplus decreased from 7.38 × 10⁸ CNY to 7.09 × 10⁸ CNY. (2) Most regions are required to bear ecological compensation for air purification consumed by the industrial sector, while some regions in Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang are also required to compensate for water conservation consumed by industry. (3) No region is required to bear ecological compensation for water conservation and soil retention consumed by the tourism industry; however, regions such as Turpan and Alxa are required to compensate for carbon sequestration and oxygen release consumed by tourism, with the average compensation increasing from 1.35 × 10⁶ CNY to 1.54 × 10⁷ CNY.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.