Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42139280›Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2026

DNA Copy Number Profiling in Extracellular Vesicles as Clinical Biomarkers of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.

Ryosuke Uekusa, Akira Yokoi, Mayu Ukai, Kosuke Yoshida, Kunanon Chattrairat, Takao Yasui, Yasuhide Inokuma, Masami Kitagawa, Eri Asano-Inami, Masato Yoshihara and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Engineering Magnetic Beads for Affinity Enrichment of Exosomes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ryosuke UekusaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Akira YokoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-5102
Mayu UkaiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan.
Kosuke YoshidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kunanon ChattrairatDepartment of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Japan.
Takao YasuiDepartment of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasuhide InokumaDivision of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masami KitagawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Eri Asano-InamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Masato YoshiharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Satoshi TamauchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Nobuhisa YoshikawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kaoru NiimiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Juntaro MatsuzakiDivision of Pharmacotherapeutics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro OchiyaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0776-9918
Anil K SoodDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4242-1762
Yusuke YamamotoLaboratory of Integrative Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki KajiyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

Aichi Cancer Research FoundationDaiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life ScienceJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP 21ck0106630h0002Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP256f0137010Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJCR2576Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJFR204JJapan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI 20K22806Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI 21H03075Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI 24K02586Nagoya University Research FundPrincess Takamatsu Cancer Research FundStrategic Professional Development Program for Young ResearchersTokai Pathways to Global ExcellenceToyota Mobility FoundationUehara Memorial Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, circulate in body fluids and carry pathological genomic information. High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most common subtype of ovarian cancer, characterized predominantly by copy number variations (CNVs). This study evaluated the clinical significance of EV-DNA focusing on CNV profiles and exploring its potential as a companion biomarker for predicting therapeutic response and supporting diagnosis in HGSOC. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction detected concordant CNVs between tumor DNA and EV-DNA in ascites but not in serum. EV-DNA showed higher concordance with the CNV status of tumor DNA than cell-free DNA in ascites. The EV-DNA amount in malignant ascites was significantly higher than that in ascites from benign ovarian tumors (p < 0.05), and elevated EV-DNA was observed even in cytology-negative ovarian cancer, suggesting an increase early in disease development. Moreover, CNV profiles showed marked differences between responders and nonresponders to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. An equation based on five genes (ARID1A, NOTCH3, CSMD3, ELP4, and BARD1) showed strong predictive performance for olaparib response (area under the curve = 0.91). Collectively, these findings indicate that the CNV status of EV-DNA may serve as a non-invasive companion biomarker for patient stratification and therapeutic monitoring in HGSOC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDNA Copy Number VariationsExtracellular VesiclesOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedBiomarkers, Tumorcopy number variationsEV‐DNAexosomesextracellular vesicleshigh‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42139280
PMCPMC13178793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.