ArticlePloS one2026
Experimental and computational models for intracardiac flow analysis with blood speckle imaging.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracardiac flow analysis aims to evaluate blood flow patterns and associated parameters for the assessment of cardiac function. However, there is limited understanding as to how flow parameters are influenced by various sources, such as pressure upstream/downstream and cardiac chamber compliance. The objective of this study was to investigate experimental and computational tissue-mimicking models to be used alongside 2D Blood Speckle Imaging for intracardiac flow analysis. Two geometries, an axisymmetric swell and idealized left ventricle, were utilized. As an initial parameter of interest, the pressure-drop across each geometry was determined from tissue-mimicking phantoms using direct pressure measurements, blood speckle imaging, and 3D computational fluid dynamics simulations with fluid-structure interaction. The results indicate limited quantitative agreement between direct measurements, 2D blood speckle imaging, and 3D computational fluid dynamics, with qualitative agreement capturing a consistent shape of the pressure drop curve between methods. Additionally, the importance of phantom design is demonstrated due to the likely impact of gel thickness on flow patterns and their associated measurements. The findings of this study indicate that future work focusing on the optimization of BSI settings and increasing model complexity with the inclusion of cardiac valves and patient-specific geometries are still required. These models may then allow for further tuning of variables to better understand their effect on various intracardiac flow parameters, and ultimately their clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.