ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Cross-spectral fusion of thermal and RGB imaging for objective pain estimation.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain assessment remains challenging for patients unable to verbally communicate, including neonates, cognitively impaired individuals, sedated patients, and those who suppress expressions due to cultural norms or stoicism. We demonstrate that integrating thermal imaging with RGB facial expression analysis provides more accurate and robust pain intensity estimation than either modality alone. Our dual-camera system records synchronized thermal and RGB video, processed through a cross-spectral attention fusion (CSAF) model with a temporal transformer for continuous 0-10 scale pain prediction. In a controlled laboratory pain induction study, 50 healthy adults (ages 21-68, 87.3 h video) underwent Cold Pressor Test and pressure algometry protocols; our system achieves MAE = 0.79, representing a 33.1% improvement over RGB-only (MAE = 1.18, p < 0.001). In a real-world clinical postoperative monitoring study, 30 surgical patients (ages 31-74, 17.7 h video) recovering from abdominal surgery were monitored; our system achieves MAE = 1.08, representing a 28.5% improvement over RGB-only (MAE = 1.51, p < 0.001). Across the combined cohort (n = 80), MAE = 0.87 (29.3% overall improvement over RGB-only). Benefits increase at higher pain intensities (38.5% at severe pain) and for challenging populations where expressions are suppressed (37.6% for low expressers). Thermal responses precede visible expressions by 1.2 ± 0.3 seconds, enabling earlier detection. This work was validated on adults only; pediatric applications require dedicated validation. Translation to clinical practice requires multi-site prospective trials, regulatory approval, and careful implementation planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.