ArticlePloS one2026
Investigating a potential association between agenesis of the third molars and variations in dental crown dimensions.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between third molar agenesis and mesiodistal crown dimensions in individuals from Germany. The sample consisted of 314 (156 males and 158 females) orthodontic patients, divided into two groups: one group with individuals presenting at least one congenitally missing third molar and a control group with individuals having a full complement of 32 teeth. The mesiodistal crown width of each fully erupted permanent tooth was measured at its maximum dimension. The t-test was used to compare mesiodistal width between groups, with additional analyses according to gender and dental arch. A chi-square test evaluated the distribution of third molar agenesis among genders, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI95%) were calculated. Pearson correlation assessed the relationship between the number of missing third molars and mesiodistal crown size. A total of 89 patients with third molar agenesis and 225 controls were included. Forty-three males and 46 females presented agenesis; with no significant association between gender and third molar agenesis (p = 0.760; OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.66-1.73). Mesiodistal dimensions were significantly different between males and females (p < 0.05). Patients with third molar agenesis exhibited a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in mesiodistal size across all teeth, most notably in second molars and maxillary lateral incisors. In males, all teeth in the agenesis group showed smaller dimensions compared to controls, with differences ranging from -0.43 to -0.15, the largest observed in the second maxillary molars (-0.43). In females, 18 of 28 teeth showed significant reductions, ranging from -0.42 to 0.00, with the largest difference in the left second mandibular molar (-0.42). The correlation between the number of missing third molar and mesiodistal size showed some negative moderate correlations, especially for lower canines (left r = -0.459, and right r = -0.534). In conclusion, third molar agenesis is associated with reduced mesiodistal crown dimensions in individuals from Germany, with this effect being more pronounced in males than in females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.