ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring nocturnal soundscapes in an Australian open forest system using acoustic indices.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nocturnal environments and their ecology remain noticeably under-represented in the scientific literature, despite their ecological importance, largely due to the practical challenges of sampling nighttime ecology. Passive acoustic monitoring provides a cost-effective, scalable tool for extracting ecological insights from continuous recordings, using acoustic indices. This study assessed whether a suite of acoustic indices can capture the diversity of nighttime calls (i.e., sonotype richness used here as a proxy for biodiversity) in a terrestrial ecosystem. Our main findings supported an interaction effect of indices (acoustic activity (ACT), acoustic evenness (AEI), spectral entropy (Hf), soundscape saturation (Sm)) correlating best with variation in sonotype richness. This result was further supported by habitat-dissimilarity analyses based on manually tagged insect sonotype richness compared to index values showing significant similarities. Although the methodological framework used in this study is adaptable to other environments, index performance is unlikely to be directly transferable due to differences in vocal assemblages and background noise conditions. Overall, the study provides a useful procedure to track patterns in nighttime ecology and support the evaluation of the state of nighttime ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.