ArticlePloS one2026
Social factors related to the quality of life among older adults in southwestern Poland.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe quality of life of older adults is closely linked to functioning in the living environment. This study aims to assess the quality of life of older adults in southwestern Poland and the social factors determining it.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included a voluntary sample of 1108 older adults aged 60‒90. The WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire was used to assess quality of life.
resultsThe overall quality of life of the respondents (57%) was good. Men had a better quality of life in the psychological (69.0 ± 9.5 vs. 63.0 ± 6.5, p < 0.001) and environmental (69.0 ± 6.0 vs. 63.0 ± 9.5, p < 0.01) domains compared to women. In comparison, those living in a relationship had a better quality of life in the somatic (75.0 ± 9.0 vs. 69.0 ± 9.0, p = 0.034), social (75.0 ± 12.5 vs. 69.0 ± 9.5, p < 0.001), and environmental (69.0 ± 6.0 vs. 63.0 ± 9.5, p < 0.001) domains. Those with higher education had a better quality of life in the somatic (75.0 ± 6.0 vs. 69.0 ± 9.0 and 69.0 ± 9.0, p < 0.001), psychological (69.0 ± 6.5 vs. 63.0 ± 9.5 and 63.0 ± 6.5, p < 0.001), and environmental (69.0 ± 6.0 vs. 63.0 ± 9.5 and 63.0 ± 6.5, p < 0.001) domains compared to those with secondary and primary education. Respondents in good health had a better quality of life in all domains.
conclusionsGood quality of life in older adults surveyed is determined by male gender, marital status in a relationship, higher education, good health ratings, and fewer chronic diseases. Our results can guide policymakers, highlighting the fact that good health, fewer chronic diseases, and higher education, translate into a better quality of life. Therefore, there should be improved access to education for all people. And good population health should be prioritized by decision-makers.
trial registrationISRCTN platform as 18225729; January 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.