ArticlePloS one2026
Chrysoprase color grading with machine learning: A systematic approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The color of gemstones plays a pivotal role in determining their quality and significantly impacts their market value. However, inconsistencies in gemstone color evaluation, stemming from the subjective nature of color perception, have hindered standardization in the market. Chrysoprase, celebrated for its distinctive apple-green color, is no exception. To address these challenges, this study employs a machine learning-based approach to automate chrysoprase color grading. CIE (1976) L*a*b* data were measured for 51 chrysoprase samples and 676 green reference points generated using the GemDialogue Color Reference using an X-Rite SP62 spectrophotometer. K-means was applied for color clustering, with Fisher discriminant analysis used to validate the clustering results. Various machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, neural networks, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machines, and random forest, were trained on labeled data to assign chrysoprase colors to different groups. Logistic regression and neural network achieved comparably high macro F1-scores, and logistic regression was ultimately selected due to its simplicity, interpretability, and computational efficiency. In independent evaluation on 51 real chrysoprase samples, all samples were correctly classified within the present dataset. Additional mixed cross-validation incorporating both synthetic and real samples yielded consistent performance (macro F1-score = 99.59%), further supporting the robustness of the proposed approach. These results demonstrate the feasibility of applying machine learning techniques to structured gemstone color grading. The proposed framework provides a reproducible approach for objective chrysoprase color evaluation and may be adaptable to other gemstones with comparable colorimetric characteristics, subject to further validation. A publicly accessible chrysoprase color grading application is available at: https://github.com/harden2009190006/Chrysoprasecolorclassifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.