ArticlePloS one2026
Towards sustainable pharmacy practice: Community pharmacists' experiences with medicine waste, reuse and disposal.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the perspectives and experiences of community pharmacists in Northern Ireland regarding returned medicines, pharmaceutical waste, and safe disposal practices, with a focus on identifying barriers, opportunities, and policy implications.
methodsA qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews was conducted with 15 community pharmacists recruited through purposive sampling. Interviews were held online using Zoom or Microsoft Teams, lasting 30-45 minutes each. Data was audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-step inductive thematic analysis framework. Two researchers independently coded the data, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion.
resultsSeven key themes were identified: (1) Equitable access to return services, highlighting variability in public awareness and participation; (2) Safe pharmacy disposal practices, reflecting structured yet resource-dependent protocols; (3) Waste reduction through supply control, where pharmacists actively worked to minimise unnecessary dispensing; (4) Collaborative waste management, revealing informal partnerships with GPs and care homes; (5) Financial/Operational Burden of Disposal Services, showing frustration at the destruction of potentially reusable medications; (6) Workforce skills and support, noting a lack of formal training and clear guidance; and (7) Legal Tensions in Medicine Reuse, capturing the stiffness between waste reduction and strict safety regulations.
conclusionCommunity pharmacists in Northern Ireland are committed to reducing medicine waste and ensuring safe disposal, but face regulatory, operational, and workforce-related barriers. Addressing these challenges will require standardised protocols, pharmacist-led public education, and greater integration into prescribing processes. These actions directly support global efforts toward achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, including Good Health and Well-being, Responsible Consumption and Production, and Climate Action. Empowering pharmacists through training, policy support, and interprofessional collaboration is essential for building a more sustainable, equitable, and environmentally responsible healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.