Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42139001›Full record

ArticleJournal of deaf studies and deaf education2026

Health literacy of the Deaf community: a scoping review.

Kang Suen Goh, Ryan Chun Chien Yau, Thisari Madhavee Dharmapriya, Uma Devi M Palanisamy, Sabrina Anne Jacob

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kang Suen GohJeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Sunway, Malaysia.
Ryan Chun Chien YauJeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Sunway, Malaysia.
Thisari Madhavee DharmapriyaFaculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Uma Devi M PalanisamyJeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Sunway, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-8241
Sabrina Anne JacobJeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Sunway, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-8012-7789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review examined health literacy among Deaf populations and identified gaps in current evidence. A systemic search of PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane was conducted from database inception to December 31, 2024. English-language quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies reporting from the perspective of Deaf individuals of any age were included, alongside studies evaluating educational interventions. Data were charted using a standardized extraction framework and analysed thematically. Fifty-seven studies from 14 countries met the inclusion criteria. Four themes emerged: health literacy of Deaf people, factors affecting the health literacy of Deaf people, source of health information, and impact of interventions on health literacy levels. Overall, Deaf people demonstrated poorer health literacy levels than hearing populations, largely due to communication barriers and inaccessible health information. While educational interventions improved knowledge, evidence on their sustained impact remains limited. Findings underscore the need for culturally-competent, sign-language-accessible health education to reduce health inequities.

Indexed as

DeafnessHealth LiteracyPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesDeaf CultureHumansSign Language

Identifiers

PMID42139001
PMCPMC13595092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.