ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2026
Delayed infant development: content analysis of a nursing diagnosis proposal.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the content of the nursing diagnosis "Delayed infant development."
methodMethodological study addressing the content analysis phase, using a mixed approach. The first stage was a quantitative agreement study; the second was a qualitative consensus study. Both stages were carried out with proficient individuals. For analysis, the Binomial test was used, with a p value equal to or greater than 0.05 and a cutoff point of 0.85. The level of significance adopted was 5%.
resultsThe proposed diagnosis obtained high agreement among the judges regarding its structure (title, definition, defining characteristics, related factors, at-risk populations, and associated conditions), with more than 85% approval. Some characteristics were reformulated to align with NANDA-I, improving clarity and clinical applicability.
conclusionThe content validity was satisfactory, proving to be relevant, clear, and applicable to nursing practice. Its adoption may favor the early detection of delays in child development and support multidisciplinary interventions, especially in vulnerable contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.