ReviewBrazilian oral research2026
NiTi instruments in endodontics: contemporary concepts, principles, and practical guidance.
Review in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical Performance and Biomechanical Implications of a Reduced-Taper Reciprocating Instrument Compared With 6 Reciprocating Systems.International endodontic journal · 2026Article
- Multimethod Evaluation of the Novel Reciproc Minima System: Geometric Design, Mechanical Performance, and Irrigation Dynamics.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Beyond S-cross section design: mechanical properties, metallurgical features and shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments in double curved canals.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Comparative Assessment of Observed Dentinal Defects Following Root Canal Preparation With TruNatomy, ProTaper Next, and Dia-X Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems: An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review synthesizes current laboratory and clinical evidence on nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic instruments and translates it into guidance for clinical practice, addressing inconsistencies in the translation of research findings and a lack of standardization. Evidence on the evolution, metallurgy, heat treatments (e.g., M-Wire, Gold, and Blue), geometric design, mechanical properties, and clinical performance of contemporary NiTi systems were synthesized, with emphasis on shaping outcomes, including canal transportation, volumetric changes, unprepared canal walls, and remaining dentin thickness. Modern NiTi instruments, particularly those with advanced heat treatments, provide superior flexibility and cyclic fatigue resistance compared with conventional alloys, enabling safer and more predictable canal preparation. Continuous rotary systems often achieve better canal centering and less transportation than reciprocating systems; however, both leave a substantial portion of canal walls untouched, highlighting the essential role of chemical debridement. Long-term clinical success depends primarily on biological factors and careful technique rather than on the specific instrument system. Therefore, NiTi instruments represent the standard of care, offering anatomically respectful canal shaping. Clinicians should integrate knowledge of alloy properties, design features, and failure mechanisms with conservative, load-managing techniques to maximize safety and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.