Trial reportJAMA network open2026
Extended Barrier Precautions vs Hand Hygiene Alone and Neonatal Sepsis in Intensive Care Patients: The BALTIC Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Error in Visual Abstract.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The effects of contact precautions (ie, gowns and gloves) for individual patients colonized with gram-negative (GN) drug-resistant bacteria on sepsis risk in neonates requiring intensive care remain to be clarified. Objective: To evaluate the noninferiority of standard hand hygiene disinfection vs standard hygiene disinfection plus extended barrier precautions for infants colonized with third-generation cephalosporins-resistant GN bacteria (3GCR-GNB). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster-randomized clinical trial was conducted from 2020 to 2023 in 12 German tertiary care neonatal intensive units caring for neonates with high risk for infections with GNB for 24 months, with crossover after 12 months. Follow-up and data curation were completed December 31, 2024, and statistical analysis was finalized on July 31, 2025. Intervention: The intervention was standard hand hygiene disinfection compared with current recommendations, ie, hygiene disinfection plus extended barrier precautions with gowns and gloves for routine care of infants colonized with 3GCR-GNB. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of health care-associated GNB bloodstream infections (BSI) at infant level in all neonates requiring intensive care in the cluster, assuming 5% as noninferiority margin delta; secondary outcomes included transmission rates of 3GCR-GNB and rates of any infection. Results: The primary analysis was based on an overall sample size of 12 sites with crossover at 12 months, making 24 clusters with 9731 neonates. During the standard hand hygiene disinfection periods, 22 of 4699 infants (0.5%) developed GNB BSIs at infant level, compared with 25 of 5032 infants (0.5%) cared for during the extended barrier precaution periods (risk difference [RD], -0.03%; 95% CI, -0.43% to 0.38%; noninferiority P < .001). At least 1 nosocomial transmission with 3GCR-GNB was noted during 41 of 144 months in the intervention period and 54 of 144 months in the control period (RD, -9.03%; 95% CI, -27.79% to 9.74%), with involvement of 116 patients (2.5%) vs 149 patients (3.0%) (RD, -0.44%, 95% CI, -2.47% to 1.58%). The total rate of BSI was 2.1% in neonates during the intervention period vs 2.0% during the control period (RD, 0.12%; 95% CI, -1.39% to 1.64%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster-randomized clinical trial, standard hand hygiene disinfection for the care of infants colonized with 3GC-GNB was noninferior to standard hygiene disinfection plus extended barrier precautions. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00019103.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.