Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42138919›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Women Aged 45 to 64 Years.

Jennifer C Spencer, Jane R Montealegre, Jessica Calderón-Mora, Michael P Pignone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer C SpencerDepartment of Population Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin.
Jane R MontealegreDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jessica Calderón-MoraDepartment of Population Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin.
Michael P PignoneMargolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While eligibility for cancer screening tests varies by age, women aged 45 to 64 years should regularly screen for 3 cancers (breast, cervical, and colorectal). However, utilization of these screening tests varies. Objective: To evaluate patterns of screening across 3 cancers in age-eligible women and to identify screening gaps. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a retrospective analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey-a population-based survey of the US-collected January to December 2024. Participants were survey respondents who were women aged 45 to 64 years, reflecting the ages in which women are currently recommended to complete screening for all 3 cancers. Exposure: Differences in screening patterns across sociodemographic characteristics, including age, insurance coverage, educational attainment, income, and past-year health care use, were evaluated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey-weighted means and univariable and multivariable regressions were used to evaluate up-to-date (UTD) use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The proportion and total number of US women estimated to be due for each combination of screenings are reported. Factors associated with being UTD with any screening (vs no screening) and with all screenings (vs 1 or 2 screenings) are identified. Results: The final sample was 68 111 women (mean [SD] age 54.8 [5.8] years), of whom 35 047 (weighted percentage, 50.3%) reported being UTD with all 3 cancer screening tests, 19 389 (weighted percentage, 28.8%) were UTD with 2 screenings, 8776 (weighted percentage, 13.2%) were UTD with only 1 screening, and 4899 (weighted percentage, 7.7%) were UTD with no screenings. Together, these reflect an estimated 17.9 million women aged 45 to 64 years who were due for 1 or more screening tests, with nearly half this group (42.2%; 7.6 million women) due for multiple tests. Socioeconomic factors were associated with all (vs 1 or 2) screenings, while access factors (eg, health insurance, having a regular health care practitioner) were associated with use of both any screening and all screenings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of screening patterns, nearly 18 million middle-aged US women were estimated to be overdue for 1 or more cancer screening tests. Access-related policies or bundled clinical interventions that improve screening across multiple tests should be prioritized to most effectively reduce the burden of screen-detectable cancers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42138919
PMCPMC13179544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.