ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2026
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Single-Center Experience in Latin America.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Latin America: It is Not All about the Money.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients in whom conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures have failed to achieve a sustained return of spontaneous circulation after cardiorespiratory arrest. Limited information is available in centers in Latin America.
objectiveTo evaluate in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of adult patients treated with ECPR after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in a high-complexity center in Argentina.
methodsA single-center cohort study was performed. Consecutive adult patients who underwent ECPR between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Witnessed IHCA cases of probable cardiac origin were included.
resultsFifteen patients were included in the analysis, representing 16% of the venoarterial ECMO cases implanted at the center during this period. The median age was 46 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 34 to 57); 33% were female. Cannulation was peripheral in 93.3%, and 66% of ECMO runs were placed with an initial bridging strategy to recovery. The median duration of circulatory support was 5 days (IQR: 2 to 9). Venoarterial ECMO was successfully removed in 60% of patients, and in-hospital survival was 46%. Median follow-up after discharge was 12 months (IQR: 3 to 34), with 100% long-term survival.
conclusionVenoarterial ECMO as a treatment for IHCA in our center demonstrated acceptable survival to hospital discharge and long-term survival. Venoarterial ECMO may be an effective treatment in highly selected patients when conventional therapies fail and may be useful and applicable in a low- and middle-income country with limited access to other circulatory assist devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.