Observational studyCoDAS2026
Self-perception of swallowing, vocal symptoms, and the possibility of dysphagia occurrence in patients under palliative care.
Observational study in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo identify, compare, and correlate self-perception of swallowing, vocal symptoms, and the possibility of dysphagia in patients under Palliative Care (PC).
methodsObservational, cross-sectional, and analytical study, approved by the Research Ethics Committee (nº 6.039.141), with a convenience sample collected between April/2023 and May/2024. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. Included were hospitalized patients in the PC unit, of both sexes, aged over 18 years. Exclusion criteria were lack of clinical conditions and/or willingness to participate. After signing the informed consent form, patients completed the EAT-10, VoiSS, and RaDI-H protocols.
resultsA total of 50 patients participated, with a prevalence of males (58%), over 60 years of age (64%), cancer diagnosis (66%), and oral feeding route (74%). Sarcopenia (46%) and dyspnea (52%) were observed. Negative self-perception of swallowing was found in 80% of patients. On the total VoiSS score, 58% scored above the cutoff, with the greatest impact on the limitation domain (44%). Dysphagia was possible in 62% of patients. There was a significant difference between patients with and without sarcopenia regarding self-perception of swallowing, limitation domain, total VoiSS score, and possibility of dysphagia. Significant differences were also found between patients with and without dyspnea reports in all three protocols, except for the emotional domain of the VoiSS. Positive correlations were observed among the protocols.
conclusionIn these PC patients, there was negative self-perception of swallowing, self-reported vocal symptoms, and possibility of dysphagia, with positive correlation among the three protocols. Significant differences were found in self-perception of swallowing, vocal symptoms, and possibility of dysphagia, with greater impact in patients with sarcopenia and dyspnea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.