ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Validation of a tool to assess knowledge about immunization among people living with HIV/AIDS.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto validate a tool that assesses healthcare professionals' knowledge regarding immunization of people living with HIV/AIDS.
methodsa methodological validity study by experts in the field.
resultsthe tool, titled "Vacina+HIV", consists of 35 questions about immunization of people living with HIV/AIDS. The tool was validated by 11 experts. Regarding the Confidence Validity Interval, the values achieved were 0.99 for content, 0.96 for objective, 1.00 for written language, and 0.98 for relevance, reaching an overall Confidence Validity Interval of 0.98, and being considered validated.
conclusionsthis is believed to be the first validated tool on this topic for healthcare professionals in Brazil. The results demonstrate the validity of a tool that can help identify knowledge gaps that can be better addressed through different continuing education strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.