ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Development of a protocol on safe practices for insulin preparation and administration.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto develop and validate a protocol for safe insulin preparation and administration in healthcare settings.
methodsthis methodological study, conducted from September 2022 to May 2024, had two phases. Phase one involved protocol development and validity by 46 experts using AGREE II for content and methodological aspects. Phase two trained 40 healthcare professionals in Fortaleza, Brazil, with pre/post-tests assessing knowledge acquisition. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reproducibility measures (Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega), Content Validity Index, and various statistical tests.
resultsthe protocol achieved high quality and internal consistency, with a Content Validity Index of 97.83-100 (p<0.001). Its overall quality score was 95.7% (6.70 ± 0.47), and all six domains scored ≥ 90.0. High reproducibility was confirmed (alpha=0.94, omega=0.95). After training, correct responses significantly increased from 32% to 70%.
conclusionsthe validated protocol is a high-quality technology that significantly enhances healthcare professionals' knowledge of safe insulin practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.