ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
EchoAgent: guideline-centric reasoning agent for echocardiography measurement and interpretation.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEchocardiographic interpretation requires video-level reasoning and guideline-based measurement analysis, which current deep learning models for cardiac ultrasound do not support. We present EchoAgent, a framework that enables structured, interpretable automation for this domain.
methodsEchoAgent orchestrates specialized vision tools under large language model (LLM) control to perform temporal localization, spatial measurement, and clinical interpretation. A key contribution is a measurement-feasibility prediction model that determines whether anatomical structures are reliably measurable in each frame, enabling autonomous tool selection. We curated a benchmark of diverse, clinically validated video-query pairs for evaluation. To assess robustness across institutions, we further evaluate EchoAgent on a curated subset of the publicly available MIMIC-IV-EchoQA benchmark, specifically targeting questions answerable via linear measurements to remain within the current framework's scope.
resultsEchoAgent outperforms current medical VLMs and cardiac foundation models in video-level reasoning, demonstrating superior accuracy and interpretability on both our internal benchmark and the external MIMIC-IV-EchoQA subset. Outputs are grounded in visual evidence and clinical guidelines, supporting transparency and traceability.
conclusionThis work demonstrates the feasibility of agentic, guideline-aligned reasoning for echocardiographic video analysis, enabled by task-specific tools and full video-level automation. EchoAgent provides a framework for enhancing transparency and guideline-adherence, representing a step toward more trustworthy AI in cardiac ultrasound. Our code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/DeepRCL/EchoAgent .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42138794What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.