ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a stepwise technical guide.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection remains a critical operation in selected patients with testicular cancer, including defined settings of early metastatic disease, post-chemotherapy residual masses, and emerging indications for primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in low-volume seminoma. Despite advances in minimally invasive surgery, this operation remains technically demanding because of its proximity to the great vessels, renal hilum, lumbar branches, ureters, and sympathetic neural structures. To present a standardized stepwise technical guide for robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, emphasizing reproducible exposure, peritoneal flap suspension, nerve-aware dissection, posterior plane development, controlled vascular and lymphatic management. This technical report describes robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a sequential operative workflow. Key steps include patient positioning, port placement, mesenteric incision, creation of a broad L-shaped peritoneal flap, bilateral flap suspension, cephalad stay sutures, entry into the retroperitoneal template, early neural identification, split-and-roll dissection, posterior-first interaortocaval development, and selective clip-based control of vascular and lymphatic branches. The patient is positioned supine in Trendelenburg to facilitate bowel displacement. A broad peritoneal flap is developed and suspended to maintain durable exposure. Dissection proceeds using fixed anatomic landmarks, beginning with controlled access to stable avascular planes. Sympathetic fibers are identified early when nerve preservation is oncologically appropriate. Interaortocaval and para-aortic dissection are performed using a posterior-first strategy to improve orientation and permit deliberate management of lumbar vessels. Mechanical clip control is favored for lymphatic channels and higher-risk vascular branches. Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection can be performed as a structured operation centered on exposure, orientation, neural preservation, posterior plane development, and selective vascular control. Standardization may improve technical clarity during this complex retroperitoneal procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.