Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42138750›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a stepwise technical guide.

Willy Bacaglini, Juan P Dugarte, Federico Eskenazi, Ignacio A Bianco, Julio Calderon, Rodrigo Guevara, Arie Carneiro, Gabriel Sibanto, Rene J Sotelo, Luis G Medina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Willy BacagliniDivision of Urology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juan P DugarteUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Federico EskenaziUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ignacio A BiancoUniversity of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Julio CalderonDivision of Urology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo GuevaraUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Arie CarneiroDivision of Urology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriel SibantoDivision of Urology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rene J SoteloUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. rene.sotelo@med.usc.edu.
Luis G MedinaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection remains a critical operation in selected patients with testicular cancer, including defined settings of early metastatic disease, post-chemotherapy residual masses, and emerging indications for primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in low-volume seminoma. Despite advances in minimally invasive surgery, this operation remains technically demanding because of its proximity to the great vessels, renal hilum, lumbar branches, ureters, and sympathetic neural structures. To present a standardized stepwise technical guide for robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, emphasizing reproducible exposure, peritoneal flap suspension, nerve-aware dissection, posterior plane development, controlled vascular and lymphatic management. This technical report describes robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a sequential operative workflow. Key steps include patient positioning, port placement, mesenteric incision, creation of a broad L-shaped peritoneal flap, bilateral flap suspension, cephalad stay sutures, entry into the retroperitoneal template, early neural identification, split-and-roll dissection, posterior-first interaortocaval development, and selective clip-based control of vascular and lymphatic branches. The patient is positioned supine in Trendelenburg to facilitate bowel displacement. A broad peritoneal flap is developed and suspended to maintain durable exposure. Dissection proceeds using fixed anatomic landmarks, beginning with controlled access to stable avascular planes. Sympathetic fibers are identified early when nerve preservation is oncologically appropriate. Interaortocaval and para-aortic dissection are performed using a posterior-first strategy to improve orientation and permit deliberate management of lumbar vessels. Mechanical clip control is favored for lymphatic channels and higher-risk vascular branches. Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection can be performed as a structured operation centered on exposure, orientation, neural preservation, posterior plane development, and selective vascular control. Standardization may improve technical clarity during this complex retroperitoneal procedure.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionRobotic Surgical ProceduresTesticular NeoplasmsHumansMalePatient PositioningRetroperitoneal SpaceSurgical FlapsMinimally invasive surgeryNerve-sparing surgeryRetroperitoneal lymph node dissectionRobotic surgeryRPLNDTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID42138750
PMCPMC13179237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.