ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Pancreatic cystic lesions revisited: morphologic patterns and diagnostic pitfalls in daily practice.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing use of cross-sectional imaging has led to more frequent incidental detection of pancreatic cystic lesions, presenting diagnostic challenges for radiologists. These lesions encompass a heterogeneous spectrum ranging from benign cysts to premalignant and malignant neoplasms, often with overlapping imaging features. Accurate imaging-based characterization is therefore essential for risk assessment and clinical management. This review presents a morphology-based approach to pancreatic cystic lesions, emphasizing morphologic imaging patterns as a practical framework for structured interpretation. Key features-including ductal communication, internal architecture, and the presence of mural nodules or solid components-are discussed in relation to their pathologic basis and clinical implications. Representative examples illustrate the characteristic appearances of common cystic neoplasms, including serous cystic neoplasm, mucinous cystic neoplasm, and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, along with their variants. Particular attention is given to diagnostic pitfalls and mimickers, such as cystic degeneration of solid tumors including neuroendocrine tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which may closely resemble true cystic lesions but require fundamentally different management. Through illustrative cases, this review highlights the importance of integrating morphologic pattern analysis with enhancement characteristics, ductal anatomy, and ancillary imaging findings. Recognition of these patterns and potential pitfalls is essential for accurate interpretation and clinically meaningful guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42138742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.