Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42138733›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2026

T2-FLAIR digital subtraction radiomics versus neuroradiologist visual assessment for differentiating IDH-mutant astrocytomas from other non-enhancing low-grade gliomas: An externally validated machine learning study.

Emin Demirel, Okan Dilek

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emin DemirelAfyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. dremindemirel@gmail.com.
Okan DilekAdana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Adana, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNon-invasive differentiation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, 1p/19q non-codeleted astrocytomas from other non-enhancing low-grade gliomas (LGGs) is crucial for treatment planning and prognostication, as these molecular subtypes have distinct therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes. The conventional T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) mismatch sign offers high specificity but limited sensitivity for this purpose. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a radiomics-based machine learning model using T2-FLAIR digital subtraction images to improve molecular subtype differentiation in non-enhancing LGGs and to compare its diagnostic performance with conventional neuroradiologist visual assessment.

methodsA total of 193 patients with non-enhancing LGGs were included from two independent cohorts: the Erasmus Glioma Database (EGD, n = 155, training) and The Cancer Genome Atlas Low-Grade Glioma (TCGA-LGG, n = 38, external test set). Histopathologically confirmed molecular subtypes included IDH-mutant, 1p/19q non-codeleted astrocytoma (positive class, n = 88) and other LGG subtypes comprising IDH-mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma and IDH-wildtype diffuse glioma (negative class, n = 105). T2-FLAIR digital subtraction images were generated by voxel-wise subtraction of co-registered FLAIR from T2-weighted images. Ten consensus radiomics features were selected using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR), and Boruta methods. An automated machine learning (AutoML) ensemble model was trained with 5-fold cross-validation. Two neuroradiologists (8 and 12 years of experience) independently assessed the conventional T2-FLAIR mismatch sign for comparison. Diagnostic performance was compared using the DeLong test.

resultsThe radiomics model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.879 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.821-0.937; sensitivity: 71.2%, specificity: 85.4%) in the training cohort and 0.849 (95% CI: 0.741-0.957; sensitivity: 86.4%, specificity: 75.0%) in the external test set. The model outperformed conventional T2-FLAIR mismatch assessment by neuroradiologists (training AUC: 0.768, p = 0.003; external test AUC: 0.741, p = 0.038; DeLong test). The AUC difference of 0.030 between training and external test cohorts suggested adequate generalizability. Inter-reader agreement for conventional assessment was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89).

conclusionThe proposed T2-FLAIR digital subtraction radiomics model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with conventional neuroradiologist visual assessment for differentiating IDH-mutant astrocytomas from other non-enhancing LGGs, primarily by improving sensitivity while maintaining acceptable specificity. This automated approach may serve as a complementary tool for non-invasive molecular characterization of diffuse gliomas, particularly in settings where subspecialty neuroradiology expertise may be limited.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsGliomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm GradingRadiomicsIsocitrate DehydrogenaseGliomaIDH-mutant astrocytomaMachine learningOligodendrogliomaRadiomicsT2-FLAIR mismatch

Identifiers

PMID42138733
PMCPMC13407446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.