ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2026
Ceftazidime-avibactam for multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections: outcomes and timing of initiation across 22 U.S. medical centers.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When might we consider using the newer β-lactam agents as empirical therapy against presumed carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections?JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a crucial treatment for multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative infections; however, the impact of treatment timing and outcomes in real-world practice remains unclear. This study evaluated CAZ-AVI use across diverse U.S. centers, with emphasis on early initiation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at 22 U.S. medical centers (2019-2025), including adults with MDR gram-negative infections who received CAZ-AVI ≥ 72 h. The primary outcome was composite clinical success, defined as 30-day survival, absence of microbiological recurrence, and resolution of fever and/or leukocytosis within 72 h of initiation. Early vs late initiation was assessed at 48 h. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify optimal thresholds. Among 613 patients (median age 60 years, 62.5% male, 57.1% admitted to the ICU within 24 h of index culture), the most common infection source was pneumonia (55.5%), and the most frequent pathogens were
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.