ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2026
Erosive Potential of Commercially Available Cannabis Beverages.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erosive Potential of Commercially Available Cannabis Beverages.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the erosive potential of commercially available cannabis beverages by assessing fluoride content and pH, as well as changes in microhardness and surface roughness. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixteen cannabis-infused beverages were analyzed, with distilled water used as the control. Fluoride concentration and pH were measured using a fluoride ion-selective electrode and a calibrated pH meter. Eighty-five synthetic enamel-like hydroxyapatite blocks (5 mm diameter × 5 mm thickness) were prepared and allocated into 16 experimental groups and 1 control group (n = 5/group). Specimens were immersed in 5 mL of each beverage for 30 min at 37°C. Knoop microhardness (KHN) and surface roughness (Ra) were measured before and after immersion. The percentage of surface hardness loss (%SHL) and percentage change in surface roughness (%Raalt) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (p < 0.05).
resultsMost beverages exhibited acidic pH values, with 12 samples showing pH < 4. Fluoride concentrations ranged from 0.0268 to 1.8233 mg/L, with most samples containing levels insufficient to counteract erosive effects, although one beverage exceeded recommended fluoride limits. Beverages with lower pH were associated with significant reductions in microhardness and increases in surface roughness (p < 0.05). The percentage of surface hardness loss (%SHL) ranged from approximately 27% to 74% among acidic beverages, with the highest values observed in the most acidic formulations. In contrast, beverages with near-neutral pH showed minimal changes, with %SHL below 10%. Similarly, %Raalt ranged from less than 10% in low-erosive groups to over 900% in highly acidic beverages.
conclusionCannabis beverages with low pH exhibited significant erosive potential, as evidenced by decreased microhardness and increased surface roughness on synthetic enamel-like hydroxyapatite substrates. Beverage acidity and formulation were key determinants of these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.