ArticleJournal of vision2026
Factors underlying flicker-induced time dilation: Temporal frequency, semantic content, and subjective saliency of visual stimuli.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flicker-induced time dilation refers to the robust illusion whereby temporally modulated visual stimuli are perceived as lasting longer than static stimuli. Although flicker-induced time dilation has been consistently demonstrated, it remains unclear whether its magnitude is determined solely by low-level temporal dynamics or whether higher-level semantic processing also contributes. The present study investigated the respective roles of flicker frequency, semantic content, and subjective saliency in shaping perceived duration. Using the semantic wavelet-induced frequency tagging image transformation method, we generated semantic (faces and houses) and scrambled flickers presented at 2, 4, and 6 Hz, with and without luminance modulation. In experiment 1, participants performed a duration comparison task to estimate perceived duration. In experiment 2, subjective saliency of the same stimuli was rated. Results showed that increasing flicker frequency reliably enhanced perceived duration. Crucially, semantic content did not modulate perceived duration at any frequency, regardless of luminance modulation. In contrast, subjective saliency increased both with flicker frequency and with semantic information. This dissociation indicates that, although semantic content enhances subjective saliency, it does not contribute to temporal dilation. These findings suggest that distortions in perceived time induced by visual stimuli are primarily shaped by low-level temporal dynamics and increased activity in early visual areas, whereas higher-order visual processing contribute little to the modulation of perceived duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.