Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42138505›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Factors underlying flicker-induced time dilation: Temporal frequency, semantic content, and subjective saliency of visual stimuli.

Takeya Oda, Amirmahmoud Houshmand Chatroudi, Yuko Yotsumoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takeya OdaDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Amirmahmoud Houshmand ChatroudiDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko YotsumotoDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flicker-induced time dilation refers to the robust illusion whereby temporally modulated visual stimuli are perceived as lasting longer than static stimuli. Although flicker-induced time dilation has been consistently demonstrated, it remains unclear whether its magnitude is determined solely by low-level temporal dynamics or whether higher-level semantic processing also contributes. The present study investigated the respective roles of flicker frequency, semantic content, and subjective saliency in shaping perceived duration. Using the semantic wavelet-induced frequency tagging image transformation method, we generated semantic (faces and houses) and scrambled flickers presented at 2, 4, and 6 Hz, with and without luminance modulation. In experiment 1, participants performed a duration comparison task to estimate perceived duration. In experiment 2, subjective saliency of the same stimuli was rated. Results showed that increasing flicker frequency reliably enhanced perceived duration. Crucially, semantic content did not modulate perceived duration at any frequency, regardless of luminance modulation. In contrast, subjective saliency increased both with flicker frequency and with semantic information. This dissociation indicates that, although semantic content enhances subjective saliency, it does not contribute to temporal dilation. These findings suggest that distortions in perceived time induced by visual stimuli are primarily shaped by low-level temporal dynamics and increased activity in early visual areas, whereas higher-order visual processing contribute little to the modulation of perceived duration.

Indexed as

Flicker FusionSemanticsTime PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42138505
PMCPMC13189210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.