Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42138461›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2026

Efficient collaborative learning of the average treatment effect.

Sijia Li, Rui Duan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sijia LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-0389-2593
Rui DuanDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9261-4864

Funding

Federated and transfer learning methods for cross-ancestry and cross-phenotype integration of genomic datasetsR01GM148494 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Rui Duan · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM148494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the growing need for generating real-world evidence from multisite collaborative studies, we introduce an efficient collaborative learning approach to evaluate average treatment effect (ECO-ATE) in a multisite setting under data-sharing constraints. Specifically, ECO-ATE operates in a federated manner, using individual-level data from a user-defined target population and summary statistics from other source populations, to construct efficient estimator for the average treatment effect on the target population of interest. Our federated approach does not require iterative communications between sites, making it particularly suitable for research consortia with limited resources for developing automated data-sharing infrastructures. Compared to existing work data integration methods in causal inference, ECO-ATE allows distributional shifts in outcomes, treatments, and baseline covariates distributions, and achieves semiparametric efficiency bound under appropriate conditions. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate the extent of efficiency gains achieved by incorporating additional data sources, as well as the robustness of our approach against varying levels of distributional shifts and overparameterization, compared to existing benchmarks. We apply ECO-ATE to a case study examining the effect of insulin versus non-insulin treatments on heart failure for patients with type II diabetes using electronic health record data collected from the All of Us program.

Indexed as

Federated LearningComputer SimulationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsHeart FailureHumansInformation DisseminationInsulinModels, StatisticalTreatment OutcomeInsulincausal inferencedata integrationfederated learningsemiparametric theory

Identifiers

PMID42138461
PMCPMC13595063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.