ArticleBiometrics2026
Efficient collaborative learning of the average treatment effect.
Article in Biometrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the growing need for generating real-world evidence from multisite collaborative studies, we introduce an efficient collaborative learning approach to evaluate average treatment effect (ECO-ATE) in a multisite setting under data-sharing constraints. Specifically, ECO-ATE operates in a federated manner, using individual-level data from a user-defined target population and summary statistics from other source populations, to construct efficient estimator for the average treatment effect on the target population of interest. Our federated approach does not require iterative communications between sites, making it particularly suitable for research consortia with limited resources for developing automated data-sharing infrastructures. Compared to existing work data integration methods in causal inference, ECO-ATE allows distributional shifts in outcomes, treatments, and baseline covariates distributions, and achieves semiparametric efficiency bound under appropriate conditions. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate the extent of efficiency gains achieved by incorporating additional data sources, as well as the robustness of our approach against varying levels of distributional shifts and overparameterization, compared to existing benchmarks. We apply ECO-ATE to a case study examining the effect of insulin versus non-insulin treatments on heart failure for patients with type II diabetes using electronic health record data collected from the All of Us program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.