ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Ten-Year Public Expenditure Savings Associated with TNF Inhibitor Biosimilars under Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Pharmacology at the Point of Decision.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- From analytical similarity to clinical confidence: how regulatory evolution ensures comparable immunogenicity in streamlined biosimilar development.Bioanalysis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biologic therapies are a major and growing driver of pharmaceutical expenditure globally, with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors among the most widely used and costly biologics. In Australia, these therapies are funded through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), where biosimilars offer lower cost alternatives; however, the long-term public expenditure impact of TNF inhibitor biosimilars under regulated pricing systems has not been comprehensively quantified. We conducted a retrospective, population-level expenditure analysis using publicly available PBS Item Reports data from 2015 to 2025 to estimate PBS cost savings associated with the listing of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab biosimilars for inflammatory arthritis. Counterfactual scenarios were constructed to estimate expected expenditure in the absence of biosimilar entry, explicitly accounting for key PBS pricing mechanisms, including mandatory price reductions and price-disclosure cycles. Biosimilar listing was associated with cumulative PBS savings of AU$562.3 million over the study period. Etanercept biosimilar generated the largest absolute savings (AU$341.5 million; 23.7% reduction), whereas adalimumab biosimilars generated smaller relative savings (AU$195.3 million; 9.4% reduction), reflecting delayed biosimilar entry despite high utilization. Most savings accrued in rheumatoid arthritis, followed by ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. In conclusion, TNF inhibitor biosimilars were associated with substantial and sustained reductions in public medicine expenditure in Australia. The magnitude of savings varied markedly by molecule and was jointly determined by the timing of biosimilar entry and statutory pricing mechanisms, illustrating how regulated reimbursement systems shape realized biosimilar value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.