Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42138425›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2026

Incidence and Outcomes of Early Pacemaker Implantation for Sinus Node Dysfunction Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Jiaqi Mi, Aashish Katapadi, Eli Herink, Douglas Darden, Naga Venkata K Pothineni, Peter Park, Scott Koerber, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Rangarao Tummala, Sanghamitra Mohanty and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiaqi MiKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-0001-716X
Aashish KatapadiKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
Eli HerinkKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
Douglas DardenKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
Naga Venkata K PothineniKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-2652
Peter ParkKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
Scott KoerberKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3089-3607
Rakesh GopinathannairKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
Rangarao TummalaKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
Sanghamitra MohantyTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6601-944X
Andrea NataleTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin, Texas, USA.
Dhanunjaya LakkireddyKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
Rajesh KabraKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSinus node dysfunction (SND) may be observed following atrial fibrillation ablation (AFA), leading to urgent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. However, the incidence of PPM implantation and the long-term outcomes are not well known.

objectiveTo assess the incidence and outcomes of PPM implantation for SND immediately after AFA and assess the long-term requirement for pacing.

methodsWe conducted a multi-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent AFA from 2018 to 2024 and received PPM for SND during the same hospitalization. We assessed the patient and procedural characteristics, post-PPM complications, and atrial pacing percentage (AP%) at 30 and 90 days.

resultsOf the 8772 patients who underwent AFA, 178 patients (2.0%) received PPM implantation for SND during the same admission. The mean age was 78.6 ± 6.0 years; 48.3% were female, and 51.9% had non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; 14.6% required temporary pacing. PPM implantation was associated with complications, including pocket hematoma (10.7%) and lead malfunction (1.2%). One patient required PPM explantation for pocket erosion following pocket hematoma. At 30 days, 33.1% of patients had AP > 50% with a mean AP% of 34.1 ± 39.2%. At 90 days, 31.5% patients had AP > 50% with a mean AP% of 33.7 ± 39.0%, and 6.7% were PPM-dependent.

conclusionsWhile the incidence of PPM implantation for Sinus node dysfunction immediately following atrial fibrillation ablation is low, it is associated with an increased risk of complications, especially pocket hematoma. The need for atrial pacing decreased during follow-up. Hence, extending the monitoring period must be considered before PPM implantation.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCatheter AblationPacemaker, ArtificialSick Sinus SyndromeSinoatrial NodeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHeart RateHumansIncidenceMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsatrial fibrillationatrial pacingbradycardiacatheter ablationpacemakersinus node dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID42138425
PMCPMC13372390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.