Observational studyEpilepsia open2026
Real-world outcomes of responsive neurostimulation in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A multicenter retrospective study.
Observational study in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) characterized by multiple seizure types and high resistance to antiseizure medication (ASM), often necessitating nonpharmacologic therapies, including neuromodulation. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS), a closed-loop brain-responsive neuromodulation device, has emerged as an adjunctive treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), but evidence on its safety and effectiveness in LGS remains limited. This study examines real-world outcomes of RNS therapy in patients with LGS-associated DRE.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included patients with LGS who underwent RNS implantation before December 2024 across four Level 4 National Association of Epilepsy Centers (NAEC) in the United States. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and outcome data were systematically collected using a standardized case report form and analyzed.
resultsThirty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. At the time of RNS implantation, 95% of patients were pediatric (mean age 12.9 years, range 3.6-28.8) with a median follow-up of 24.5 months. All patients had generalized tonic seizures; additional seizure types included tonic-clonic (62%), atonic (50%), atypical absence (19%), and other (54%). The pooled responder rate (≥50% seizure reduction) was 62%, including 10% with ≥90% reduction. Thalamic-only stimulation of the bilateral centromedian nucleus (CMN) was the most common electrode configuration (76%), followed by cortico-thalamic targeting to the CMN and bi-frontal regions (18%). Among responders, 83% received thalamic-only CMN stimulation. ASM reduction occurred in 10% of patients. Adverse events were reported in 13%, primarily implant-related infections, with 4 patients requiring explantation. Stimulation-related side effects occurred in 27% and resolved with programming adjustments in 80%. SIGNIFICANCE: RNS targeting thalamic and cortico-thalamic networks resulted in seizure reduction in the majority of this predominantly pediatric LGS cohort. Therapy was generally well-tolerated with few serious adverse events, supporting its potential role as an adjunctive treatment option for DRE in LGS. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is a severe form of epilepsy that is often hard to control with medications. This study evaluated responsive neurostimulation (RNS), an implanted device that monitors brain activity and delivers electrical stimulation to help stop seizures before they spread. In 37 mostly pediatric patients, about 60% had their seizures reduced by at least half, and some improved even more. The treatment was generally safe, and most side effects could be managed by adjusting the device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.