Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42138085›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2026

Simultaneous CRISPR/Cas9-induced double-strand breaks are lethal in models of pancreatic cancer.

Selina Shiqing K Teh, Akhil Kotwal, Alexis Bennett, Eitan Halper-Stromberg, Laura Morsberger, Saum Zamani, Yanan Shi, Alyza Skaist, Qingfeng Zhu, Kirsten Bowland and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Selina Shiqing K TehDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Akhil KotwalDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences; and.
Alexis BennettDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Eitan Halper-StrombergDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Laura MorsbergerDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Saum ZamaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences; and.
Yanan ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences; and.
Alyza SkaistDepartment of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Qingfeng ZhuDepartment of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kirsten BowlandDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Hong LiangDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Ralph H HrubanDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Chien-Fu HungDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Robert A AndersDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Nicholas J RobertsDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
Robert B ScharpfDepartment of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michael GoldsteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences; and.
Ying S ZouDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.
James R EshlemanDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While radiation is an effective oncologic therapy, killing cancer by inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), it lacks specificity for neoplastic cells. We have previously adapted the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology as a cancer-specific treatment modality targeting somatic mutations in pancreatic cancer (PC). However, its tumoricidal potential remains unclear, especially in comparison with therapeutic doses of radiation. Here, we demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs are more cytotoxic in PCs than a comparable number of radiation-induced DSBs. We observed more than 90% tumor growth inhibition by targeting 9 sites with cancer-specific sgRNAs. Through both bioinformatics and cytogenetics analyses, we found that CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs triggered ongoing chromosomal rearrangements, with 87% of structural variants not directly produced from the initial CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs, and chromosomal instability peaking before cell death. By comparing the cytotoxicity of CRISPR/Cas9- and radiation-induced DSBs, we demonstrated that the number of DSBs required to achieve equitoxic effects was approximately 3 times higher for radiation than CRISPR/Cas9. Finally, we showed that PC cells that had survived CRISPR/Cas9 targeting retained susceptibility to subsequent CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs at different genomic sites with more than 87% growth inhibition. Together, our data support the therapeutic potential of CRISPR/Cas9 as an anticancer strategy.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorChromosomal InstabilityHumansMiceCancer gene therapyGenetic instabilityGeneticsOncologyRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID42138085
PMCPMC13178663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.