ReviewPsychological medicine2026
Delusional disorder and its differentiation from schizophrenia: A narrative review.
Review in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nosological status and psychopathology of delusional disorder have been a subject of debate since Kraepelin distinguished it from schizophrenia and affective psychoses. Contemporary diagnostic manuals define delusional disorder primarily by the presence of delusions, offering limited guidance for its differentiation from schizophrenia. Notably, DSM-5 introduced a major, seemingly unexplained change by allowing bizarre delusions in delusional disorder, contrary to ICD-11, prior DSM editions, and classical descriptions. This narrative review revisits the seminal works of six classical authors (Kraepelin, Jaspers, Kretschmer, Sérieux and Capgras, and De Clérambault), who shaped the concept of delusional disorder (paranoia), and their detailed clinical cases of the disorder. All considered delusional disorder to be an independent psychotic disorder, characterized by chronic, systematized, nonbizarre delusions, preservation of personality, and minimal hallucinations, with a largely intact experiential framework outside of the delusional theme. Additional features such as delusional misinterpretations, illusions, and false memories were also emphasized in the classical literature. We examined these authors' clinical cases of delusional disorder for the presence of delusional features characteristic of schizophrenia (delusional mood, first-rank symptoms, autistic-solipsistic delusions, and double bookkeeping), which index alterations in the structure of experience rather than mere delusional content. Such delusions were rarely found in the classical clinical cases of delusional disorder. Our findings highlight psychopathological distinctions between delusional disorder and schizophrenia, suggesting that schizophrenia involves a qualitative alteration of the experiential framework that is absent in delusional disorder. These findings raise concerns about the validity of the DSM-5 change, allowing bizarre delusions in delusional disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.