Observational studyJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
A Transdisciplinary Allied Health "Flying Squad" to Overcome Non-Medical Barriers to Discharge From Hospital: A Feasibility Study.
Observational study in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleAcutely hospitalised patients may be medically ready for discharge but face psychosocial and other non-medical barriers to returning home. This increases their length of stay and may lead to exposure to hospital associated risks such as hospital-acquired infections. To address these non-medical delays, a transdisciplinary allied health service (the Flying Squad, n = 1.9 Full Time Equivalent professionals) was established at The Royal Melbourne Hospital. AIMS AND
objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility (demand, implementation, practicality, acceptability and limited efficacy) of this service.
methodA single-site observational study was conducted to determine the demand (number of referrals and patient characteristics including indicators of complexity via the Blaylock Risk Assessment Screening Score; BRASS), implementation (timing of referrals and home visits completed), practicality (case examples, adverse events), acceptability (compliments and complaints) and limited efficacy (estimated number of hospital days saved through the Flying Squad intervention [anticipated minus actual length of stay], discharge destination, hospital length of stay and 28-day readmissions).
resultsOver 12 months, 147 participants were seen by the Flying Squad professionals (median age 64 years [Interquartile Range 51-78 years], 61% male, on day 14 [Interquartile age 7-24] of their hospital admission). Median BRASS scores were 14 (Interquartile Range 9-19] indicating "at risk of requiring extended discharge planning". Fifty-four home visits were completed for 34 (23%) participants, and one adverse event was reported (fall with no injuries during a home visit). The service won two hospital Awards for Excellence. The median length of hospital stay was 26 [13-45] days; 80 (54%) participants were discharged directly home, and 13 (9%) were readmitted after 28 days. It was estimated that the Flying Squad saved 756 hospital days over 12 months.
conclusionThe Flying Squad was a feasible service that may assist with addressing non-medical barriers to discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.