ArticleMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2026
Diagnosis and management of interstitial lung disease with concomitant lung cancer in Italy: Results from the ICARO clinician survey.
Article in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoexistence of interstitial lung disease (ILD), particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and lung cancer poses major diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, yet clinical management remains heterogeneous. The project aims to describe current Italian practices for integrated management of ILD with concomitant lung cancer. Methods: ICARO (Interstiziopatia e Cancro del polmone: AppRoccio al management clinico integratO) is a national cross-sectional clinician survey conducted in Italy on behalf of the Italian Respiratory Society from November 2024 to March 2025. A 12-item multiple-choice questionnaire assessed diagnostic strategies, treatment preferences, and perceived toxicity risks. Invitations were sent to X physicians, among which 38 ansewered (35 specialists and senior 3 registrars (age range: 28-68 years). Results: An ILD multidisciplinary team was available in 26/38 (71.1%) centres. Diagnostic procedures for lung cancer in ILD patients were reported as performed "always/often" by 14/38 (36.8%), with the main concern being ILD progression after procedures (31/38 - 81.6%). Most respondents continued antifibrotic therapy during systemic cancer treatment (28/38- 73.7%). Combined chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors was perceived as the highest-risk regimen by 19/38 physicians (50%), and 20/38 (52.6%) were hesitant to offer neoadjuvant immunotherapy in stage II-IIIa NSCLC. Severe toxicity from radiotherapy was reported as frequent by 8/38 (21.1%). Conclusions: Italian clinicians report substantial variability in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for lung cancer in ILDs, driven mainly by concern for ILD progression and treatment-related pulmonary toxicity. Although limited, this study unveils an urgent need for further prospective studies to better define the safety and efficacy of combined therapeutic approaches and to establish evidence-based guidelines to support clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.