ArticleMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2026
Electronic nose technology in bronchial asthma diagnosis and management.
Article in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic nose (e-nose) technology, as an emerging non-invasive diagnostic tool, has demonstrated considerable potential in the diagnosis and management of bronchial asthma. By mimicking the human olfactory system, this technology utilizes gas sensor arrays combined with pattern recognition algorithms to enable rapid analysis and identification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the exhaled breath of patients with asthma. Accumulating evidence suggests that e-nose systems can discriminate between asthma patients and healthy individuals with relatively high accuracy, and they have also shown promising performance in asthma phenotyping. Compared with conventional pulmonary function tests, e-nose technology offers distinct advantages, including cost-effectiveness, rapid response, and non-invasiveness. These features make it particularly suitable for populations requiring repeated dynamic assessment or those unable to perform high-quality pulmonary function testing. However, current evidence is primarily derived from exploratory studies, and heterogeneity exists across studies in terms of population characteristics and methodologies. This highlights the need for further standardized research to improve the consistency and reproducibility of findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.