Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137957›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2026

Quantification of Appetitive and Mechanical Aversive Associative Learning Paradigms in Drosophila via a Y-maze Assay.

Samuel J Mabry, Thaanvi Malgireddy, Sean Sarkissian, David P Saleeby, Zachary Freyberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel J MabryDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Thaanvi MalgireddyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sean SarkissianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
David P SaleebyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Zachary FreybergDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning and memory are essential for the acquisition, storage, and recall of information, enabling organisms to adapt to changes in their environment. Associative learning begins when a stimulus, either positive or negative in valence, is presented alongside a neutral stimulus. This drives the development of an association between the stimuli, leading to the subsequent establishment of a learned behavioral response to the previously neutral stimulus. Associative learning is well conserved across species, from invertebrates to humans, and is highly amenable to experimental manipulation. Drosophila melanogaster is a valuable model for dissecting the mechanisms underlying associative learning and memory, given its genetic tractability, low cost, and the high-throughput nature of fly behavioral assays. Here, we describe two distinct associative learning paradigms in the Drosophila model that employ olfaction to establish short-term learned associations using a Y-maze assay. We first describe a novel negative associative learning paradigm employing a mechanical aversive stimulus. We next describe a positive associative learning paradigm in which flies learn to approach an odor paired with an appetitive sucrose reward. Overall, these protocols offer an inexpensive and streamlined approach to investigating associative learning under a multitude of different contexts. © 2026 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Negative associative learning paradigm utilizing mechanical stimulation Basic Protocol 2: Positive associative learning paradigm utilizing sucrose feeding.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorAssociation LearningDrosophila melanogasterMaze LearningAnimalsMemoryOdorantsSmellassociative learningDrosophilamemoryodor conditioningY‐maze

Identifiers

PMID42137957
PMCPMC13177165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.