ArticleNarra J2026
Development and diagnostic performance of a novel scoring system for predicting COVID-19 severity in a national referral hospital.
Article in Narra J, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) shows a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, ranging from mild illness to severe and critical disease. Early identification of patients at risk of deterioration remains important for timely clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to develop a novel scoring system for predicting COVID-19 severity in a national referral hospital. This prospective cohort study included patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to Dr. M. Djamil Hospital, Padang, Indonesia, from May to December 2021. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and disease severity was classified according to the World Health Organization criteria. Univariate analysis was performed to identify candidate variables, followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine independent predictors of severity. A scoring system was then constructed based on the retained predictors, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and the Youden index. Five variables were independently associated with COVID-19 severity: white blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 10,000/mm3, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 1,500/mm3, platelet large cell ratio (PLCR) ≥ 30%, interleukin-6 (IL-6) ≥ 7 pg/mL, and D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL. These variables were incorporated into a scoring system with a maximum total score of 6. Using a cut-off score of 3.5, the model showed a sensitivity of 96.15% and a specificity of 79.03% for differentiating severe from non-severe COVID-19. This study highlights that a novel scoring system based on WBC, ALC, PLCR, IL-6, and D-dimer performed well in predicting COVID-19 severity and may support early risk stratification in hospitalized patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.