Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137831›Full record

ArticleNarra J2026

Relative validity of a self-dietary assessment nutrition application compared with a 3-day food record in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: A prospective study.

Chantisa Arayangkoon, Patchanon Siriyong

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Narra J, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chantisa ArayangkoonDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patchanon SiriyongDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and repeated dietary assessment is essential for nutritional management in chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, conventional methods, such as the 3-day food record, are burdensome for routine clinical use. Digital self-administered dietary assessment tools may offer a practical alternative; however, validation data in non-dialysis CKD, particularly among Asian populations, remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the relative validity of a locally adapted digital self-dietary assessment application (Nutrirodcal) compared with a 3-day food record in patients with non-dialysis CKD. This prospective single-center study enrolled adults with non-dialysis CKD stages 3-5. Participants completed both a 3-day food record (reference method) and Nutrirodcal every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Correlations between the two methods were assessed for energy, macronutrients, minerals, and fluid intake. Changes in nutritional status, biochemical parameters, and body composition were assessed as secondary outcomes. Twenty participants completed the study. At week 12, Nutrirodcal showed moderate-to- strong correlations with the 3-day food record for energy, protein, sodium, potassium, calcium, and phosphorus intake (Spearman

Indexed as

Diet RecordsNutrition AssessmentRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsChronic kidney diseasedietary assessmentdietary validationdigital healthnutrition application

Identifiers

PMID42137831
PMCPMC13170908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.