ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
How Low-Frequency Neural Activity Structures Language in Time.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of sensory information in humans may be confined to a time window of 2-3 s. In language, this time window constrains the grouping of words into multi-word chunks, required for comprehension. Chunk boundaries are known to elicit a characteristic event-related brain potential, the Closure Positive Shift (CPS). The likelihood of a CPS increases with the duration of the chunk. In the frequency-domain, boundaries have been associated with neural oscillations in the delta band (<4 Hz). Here, we assessed whether the pace for chunking might be imposed by electrophysiological processing cycles of the brain with phase-locking of such activity underlying the CPS. We recorded participants' magnetoencephalogram while they listened to globally ambiguous sentences allowing for two alternative ways of chunking. Chunking was not externally imposed, but the temporal limits of integration windows influenced chunk termination. Phase-locking of narrow-band low-frequency neural activity (i.e., <4 Hz) at the boundaries of multi-word chunks increased with sentence duration, and covaried with event-related fields. Behavioral data further indicate subtle interindividual differences in the duration of the integration time window. Source localization revealed neural generators in bilateral posterior temporal and right anterior regions. The brain appears to project duration-limited integration windows onto the incoming auditory speech signal, thus structuring language comprehension in time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.