ArticleCureus2026
Effects of Topical Steroids on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Postoperative pain in the psoas and femoral nerve distribution is common following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery. Topical steroids have shown beneficial effects in spinal surgery. The effect of topical steroids applied directly to the psoas and the traversing nerve complexes in patients undergoing stand-alone LLIF (SA-LLIF) is unclear. Purpose The purpose of this retrospective cohort study is to investigate the efficacy of topical steroids in reducing postoperative pain when applied to the psoas muscle during SA-LLIF. Methods Patients who underwent SA-LLIF were included. Patient demographics, perioperative factors, length of stay (LOS), opioid consumption measured in oral morphine equivalents (OME), and pain scores on the numeric rating scale (NRS) were recorded and analyzed. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of topical steroid use on OME, NRS, and LOS. Subgroup analysis was conducted on patients who did not receive transversus abdominal plane (TAP) blocks. Results There was no significant difference between patients who received topical steroids and those who did not. However, in the subgroup analysis of those without tap block, NRS in the first 24 hours post-surgery was significantly lower in the topical steroids group (4.1 (3.0, 5.4) vs. 5.3 (3.9, 6.4) (p = 0.03)), while there was no significant difference in OME and LOS. In multivariable analysis, topical steroid use was an independent factor associated with decreased NRS in the first 24 hours post-surgery score (β = -0.74 (95% CI -1.22, -0.25)) (p < 0.01). Conclusions Topical steroids were associated with a lower 0-24-hour NRS score in patients who did not receive a TAP block. However, overall, topical steroids did not significantly improve pain measures during the postoperative period for patients undergoing SA-LLIF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.