ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Classification and prediction of Alzheimer's disease stages and conversion from mild cognitive impairment based on multimodal data fusion.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop multimodal prediction models based on real-world clinical data for classifying different stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and for predicting the conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD. Methods: A single-center retrospective real-world cohort study was conducted. A total of 658 individuals aged ≥50 years were included and classified into cognitively normal (CN), MCI, and AD groups. Demographic characteristics, neurocognitive assessment results, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, and blood-based biomarkers were collected. Logistic regression was used to construct pairwise classification models for disease stages and prediction models for MCI-to-AD conversion. Model performance was evaluated through stepwise integration of multimodal features. Discrimination ability was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), together with calibration curves and decision curve analysis. In a sub-cohort with thin-slice MRI data, the additional value of hippocampal volume was further examined. Results: Significant differences were observed among disease stages in cognitive function, imaging markers, and blood biomarkers (all Conclusion: Multimodal prediction models based on real-world clinical data improved the accuracy of AD stage classification and the prediction of MCI-to-AD conversion risk. These models demonstrated good clinical feasibility. High-resolution structural imaging markers further enhanced predictive performance in selected populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.