Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137637›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Preferred J-pop music and visual memory retrieval: an exploratory pilot fMRI study.

Yoshiko Tojo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yoshiko TojoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Ami, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listening to music while studying is common, yet it remains unclear whether self-selected popular music facilitates or interferes with memory performance. This exploratory pilot fMRI study examined whether preferred Japanese pop music (J-Pop), compared with unpleasant sounds and a no-sound baseline, was descriptively associated with differences in visual memory retrieval, subjective focus, and regional brain activity in healthy young adults. Five participants completed a visual encoding and retrieval task under three auditory conditions during fMRI. Behavioral performance, focus ratings, and region-of-interest (ROI) activity in the anterior insula and temporo-occipital visual association cortex were examined using descriptive statistics and nonparametric analyses. Descriptively, recall accuracy and subjective focus were highest in the preferred J-Pop condition, intermediate in the no-sound condition, and lowest in the unpleasant condition; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Exploratory ROI analyses showed that anterior insula activity was descriptively higher during the J-Pop condition, whereas temporo-occipital visual association cortex activity was descriptively highest during unpleasant sounds, intermediate during J-Pop, and lowest during the no-sound condition. Brain-behavior correlations were also exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously given the very small sample size. These findings do not establish that preferred J-Pop improves memory performance or supports a specific neural mechanism. Rather, they suggest that this paradigm is feasible and may be useful for generating hypotheses about how affectively positive, self-selected music relates to visual memory retrieval, subjective focus, and salience-related neural processing in future adequately powered studies.

Indexed as

anterior insulafunctional MRIJ-pop musicmemory performancesalience networkvisual association cortex

Identifiers

PMID42137637
PMCPMC13168035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.