Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137618›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Sacred space in motion: geography, time, and texts in the historiography of Lingyan Temple.

Bin Han, Yaoping Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bin HanDepartment of Global Buddhism, Institute of Science Innovation and Culture, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yaoping LiuDepartment of Global Buddhism, Institute of Science Innovation and Culture, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the historiography of Lingyan Temple, a prominent Buddhist temple in Jinan, through an empirical and positivist lens. The study delineates the temple's historical evolution from the Eastern Jin dynasty to the present, employing a synthesis of geographical analysis, archaeological findings, epigraphic documentation, and bibliographic references. The analysis emphasizes three interrelated facets of Lingyan's historiography. The temple's prominent role in regional Buddhist networks was primarily influenced by its strategic location at the intersection of cultural and political routes in northern China. Second, the historical reconstruction of Lingyan's beginning, rise, fall, and restoration shows how the development of Buddhist temples goes in cycles, closely tied to changes in dynasties and the way people give money to temples. Third, the bibliographic evaluation of primary sources, including dynastic histories, temple gazetteers, and epigraphic inscriptions, highlights the methodological difficulties and the abundance of recreating temple history experimentally. These studies show that "sacred space" is not a set idea; it is always being rethought by history, geography, and written traditions. The research contends that a positivist methodology in Buddhist temple historiography enables a more systematic, verifiable, and comparable framework for analyzing religious heritage. This methodology enriches global dialog on the documentation, interpretation, and revitalization of religious heritage over time, while also offering insights into broader concerns related to the material, temporal, and textual aspects of sacred space in Chinese Buddhism, especially Lingyan Temple.

Indexed as

bibliographyBuddhist historiographyChinese BuddhismchronologygeographyLingyan Templesacred space

Identifiers

PMID42137618
PMCPMC13167405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.