Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137554›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2026

A sequential multimodal framework for spinal cord regeneration.

Eduardo Blat Sos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Beyond Scar Removal: Reprogramming the Glial Scar for Neural Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eduardo Blat SosUniversidad CEU Cardenal Herrera, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This hypothetical study explores a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with recent complete spinal cord injuries (≤6 weeks since injury approximately). We review current literature and identify five key determinants of regenerative failure: inflammation, glial scar formation, deficit in molecular guidance, loss of structural guidance, and persistence of Wallerian debris. Although each of these barriers can be addressed by existing interventions, their efficacy depends partially on a constrained sequence of application. Based on this, a temporally orchestrated strategy is proposed, comprising early immunomodulation to stabilize the lesion environment, mechanical realignment combined with implantation of a temporary extracellular matrix to restore structural continuity, sustained molecular guidance and matrix remodeling to guide axonal growth. The proposed framework offers a mechanistically integrated and testable hypothesis for promoting functional spinal cord regeneration.

Indexed as

nervous systemneurobiologyneurologyneuropathologyneuroscienceneurosurgeryspinal cordspine injury

Identifiers

PMID42137554
PMCPMC13170459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.