Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137547›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Wildlife Responses to Drone Noise: A Preliminary Approach for Quantifying Disturbance During Single- and Dual-Drone Flights.

Saadia Afridi, Lucie Laporte-Devylder, Guy Maalouf, Samuel G Penny, Magnus Wahlberg, Blair R Costelloe, Ulrik Pagh Schultz Lundquist

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saadia AfridiUniversity of Southern Denmark Odense M Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-2720
Lucie Laporte-DevylderMarine Biological Research Centre University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark.
Guy MaaloufUniversity of Southern Denmark Odense M Denmark.
Samuel G PennyInstitute of Conservation Science and Learning Bristol Zoological Society Bristol UK.
Magnus WahlbergMarine Biological Research Centre University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark.
Blair R CostelloeDepartment of Collective Behavior Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior Konstanz Germany.
Ulrik Pagh Schultz LundquistUniversity of Southern Denmark Odense M Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drones are increasingly being deployed to study wildlife; however, growing evidence indicates that drone noise can alter animal behavior and confound ecological data. Few studies have quantified how acoustic exposure affects behavioral responses of wildlife. In this preliminary, descriptive study, we present a field-based approach that integrates in situ acoustic monitoring with behavioral scoring to document group-level disturbance patterns in free-ranging plains zebras. In Ol Pejeta Conservancy, Kenya, we monitored how flight altitude and single vs. dual drone configurations affected plains zebras (

Indexed as

acoustic disturbanceconservation technologydrone wildlife monitoringdual‐drone operationsin situ noise measurement

Identifiers

PMID42137547
PMCPMC13171223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.