ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
Machine learning-based determination of sex-related bladder cancer biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bladder cancer exhibits sex-specific behavior, occurring more frequently in males but progressing to advanced stages more commonly in females. The activation of sex hormone receptors may explain these differences, but the exact genetic drivers remain poorly understood. Furthermore, current bladder cancer biomarkers have inconsistent sensitivities and specificities in practice, making early diagnosis a challenge. Methods: This study approaches bladder cancer biomarker discovery through machine learning techniques on gender and disease-stratified RNA-seq data. Training sets limited to differentially expressed genes were subjected to four different feature selection methods: differential gene expression analysis adjusted p-value, recursive feature elimination with support vector machine, logistic regression, and an optimized random forest procedure. Gene panels were compared and aggregated across selection strategies and cross-validation folds to identify robust biomarkers for sex-specific bladder cancer development and progression. Results: When applied to unseen datasets and limited to 50 genes or less, male and female-specific panels achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.932 and 0.914, respectively, in distinguishing bladder cancer samples from non-tumor controls. In terms of enriched pathways, the male panel was associated with cell interactions and altered PI3K-AKT signaling, while the female panel was more closely connected to extracellular matrix reorganization. The panel differentiating male and female tumors had a poorer performance on external datasets compared to the sex-specific analyses, but still contained relevant genes. Discussion: Genes such as PRAC1 and PCDH11Y were identified as high-impact predictors related to sex hormones or chromosomes for male tumor development. In the female-specific panel, genes related to aberrant androgen signaling across tumor types like androgen receptor, PLXNA1, USP54, and PMEPA1 were influential. These results offer potential targets for further in vivo/vitro experimentation and provide a framework for constructing high-performance gene panels related to sex-specific bladder cancer biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.